The Three F’s of Facebook: Having Friends! Developing Friendships! OR Just Being Friendly!

Who are your ‘friends’? Why are they your ‘friends’? And what characterises people as your ‘friends’? I’ve been thinking for a long time about writing a post about ‘friends’ … the word, it’s meanings (so many) and how with digital media (and Facebook) the term ‘friend’ is evolving because of the evolution in the social digital landscape within which we live, breath, work and socialise. In this we ponder how to some ‘friends’ in a digital space, is very different to ‘friends’ we connect with in an offline world! Where as to others the differential is minimal, and their reality is defined not by digital boundaries (online and offline) but by perceptual and emotional ones (values) and for others by physical boundaries (geography). So what do we mean by the term ‘friend’?

In this post, we reflect on something that perhaps we should all reflect on: What do the terms ‘friends’, ‘friendship’ and the action ‘being friendly’ means to us, others and in our social worlds! An important reflection, especially before we add people to our FB profile; share or tag photos with/of them; email, text, call or hang out with them or better yet … invite them to be part of our world! It’s funny, because these terms are not new, they are not words we are unfamiliar with. However their meaning is so ever fluid today, more than ever before … as our digital space evolves, as it merges more with our non-digital world as we transverse spaces, so does the language and narrative we use to think and discuss ‘friends’!

If someone ‘adds’ you on Facebook, are they really your friend? What are the elements that we association with being a friend and why add someone, especially someone we might not really know? Is this changing what we mean by the term ‘friend’ or just changing how we interact with people who ‘could’ be our friends! So let’s espouse …

Having Friends – Being Friendly – Developing Friendships!

The Oxford English Dictionary defines the term ‘friend’ as:

  1. A person whom one knows, likes, and trusts.
  2. A person whom one knows; an acquaintance.
  3. A person with whom one is allied in a struggle or cause; a comrade.
  4. One who supports, sympathizes with, or patronizes a group, cause, or movement

In history … A friend is a lover, literally. The relationship between Latin amcus “friend” and am “I love” is clear, as is the relationship between Greek philos “friend” and phile “I love.” In English, though, we have to go back a millennium before we see the verb related to friend. At that time, frond, the Old English word for “friend,” was simply the present participle of the verb fron, “to love.” The Germanic root behind this verb is *fr-, which meant “to like, love, be friendly to.” Closely linked to these concepts is that of “peace,” and in fact Germanic made a noun from this root, *frithu-, meaning exactly that. Ultimately descended from this noun are the personal names Frederick, “peaceful ruler,” and Siegfried, “victory peace.” The root also shows up in the name of the Germanic deity Frigg, the goddess of love, who lives on today in the word Friday, “day of Frigg,” from an ancient translation of Latin Veneris dis, “day of Venus.

So, from the above we can see characteristics and terms such as: “to know, knowledge of, to like, trust, love, is allied to, supportive of, sympathize with, peaceful, friendly to, lover of, someone I love” … a number for wonderful, deep and emotive words that create a psychological boundary around what is a ‘friend’ is, ‘how friends behave’ and ‘our relationship with them’

But what about in digital social networks, such as on Facebook, where the term ‘friend’ is used alot? Blurring the lines between connectivity and deep emotive social bonds. Are we connecting to ‘have friends’; ‘develop friendships‘ or are we just ‘being friendly‘ by adding people we have just met, chatted to, shared an experience and thought/hope they might become part of intimate circle of people who are our currently our friends. People who we might work with, grew up with or have known forever – such as family … in this the term ‘friends‘ and the activity of ‘being friendly‘ is about developing social bonds. In this we evolve from weak ties to deeper stronger ties with people … developed based on our level and type of emotive connectedness with them – similar values, loves, hates, opinions … but at it’s core development of mutual trust, respect and … love!

Connectivity – Connections – Connectedness

So from this it is important to distinguish between a number of other terms cognisiant with and used to describe the digital media space … ‘having connectivity’, ‘adding connections’ and ‘developing connectedness’. The differential between these terms is about the extent or evolution from the technical bonds to the emotive social bonds between users of a system (i.e., nodes in a network) and the technical infrastructure that can and does connect them. In this sense,

  • ‘having connectivity’ = is the ability and functionality of a digital system to ‘connect’ nodes in a networks – be it people, computers or data points … i.e., being connected to the Internet gives you connectivity!
  • ‘add connections’ = is the number and quality of nodes that exist in a complex system – be it people, computers or data points’… i.e., being on Facebook and adding friends gives you connections!
  • ‘developing connectedness’ = is the emotive social bonds between nodes in a network – and in this essence is more about human social bonds and social capital that you develop… i.e., engaging in dialogue and conversation with friends through Facebook gives you connectedness!

So in essence, ‘adding a friend’, ‘having friends, and ‘developing friendships’ are not one in the same – be it in an offline space such as at work or university or an online digital space such as Facebook. Connectivity through social networks most certainly might provide the digital opportunity for the latter to occur, however it is the deep rich social bonds and thus ‘connectedness’ between ‘friends’ in a network, that makes true, deep and lasting ‘friendships’ develop, grow and sustain … no matter if you are in an online or offline space …

So next time someone asks you to ‘Add’ them as a Facebook Friend, and thus you are giving them permission to see into the privacy of your world … ask yourself three questions:

1. ‘Are they really a friend?” [See the definition above!]
2. “Do you want to potentially build a friendship with them?”
3. OR “Are you just being friendly?”

Smiles

Kelly

:-)

P.s. “Family are the friends you grow up with; Friends the family your choose; and Strangers the friends you haven’t met yet” (Dr. Kelly Page, 2010).

Share and Enjoy

7 Comments

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Three F's of Facebook: Having Friends! Developing Friendships! OR Just Being Friendly! | Case Insights -- Topsy.com

  • Michael
    October 15, 2010 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Dr Kelly,

    This is a great post and worthy of publishing in journal. I can relate to all three F’s.

    I have many different types of friends, friendships and friendly people on Facebook. I have;

    1. Family.
    2. Off-line friends that I hang out with.
    3. Work colleges and ex college and school friends.
    4. People that I have met face to face after meeting on-line and, have a professional affinity with.
    5. People that I have never met but, have a professional affinity with.
    6. People that I have never met and, will probably never meet.

    In the case of type # 6, I have a look at their profile and try to make a judgement on whether to invest in developing the friendship or not. This can take a day to a few weeks to decide.

    In the case of type # 5, I have made some wonderful on-line friends that are completely like minded and have developed into invaluable business mentors and vice versa.

    I remember reading an article entitled “Do not accept friend requests on Facebook if you don’t know them”. The main argument was to do with privacy and trust issues. I have never had a problem with this… And how are you to build your social network otherwise.

    Keep up the great work :)

    Michael

  • Bloggerbob1982
    October 17, 2010 - 9:01 am | Permalink

    Fantastic post, and a very nice adaptation of the William Butler Yates quote. You must be very smart.

  • October 18, 2010 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    Great post! In a way I’m quite sad that Facebook used the word ‘friend’ to describe what are in reality, connections. Friendship has a rich meaning that covers shared values, trust, experiences and history. I’m sure people’s relationship to the word is changing because of Facebook’s use of it, but is there language to replace the loss of a word that used to mean all these things?

  • Pingback: Growing Your Digital Footprint in Graduate School: To Blog or Not to Blog? | Case Insights

  • Rahul Chawdhry
    February 13, 2011 - 2:11 am | Permalink

    Great article Dr. Kelly , especially with rise of “Buddy Power” as we know it and how some are arguing that friends are the new family. It has important implications for marketers in India, where family is central to individual existence.

    People have started categorizing their friends which is even more interesting , i have a friend who i trust and turn to for advice when faced with a tough situation but wont “hang ” around with him on a Friday night.

  • February 22, 2011 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Rahul, thanks for your response. I agree it’s all very interesting. How we consider friends online and offline and also the different roles people play in our lives. Digital Media channels such as Facebook is most certainly influencing this.

    Smiles
    Kelly

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>